Author Archive: ken@kenrieves.com

Does a digital image really exist if it’s never printed?

OK, this post may be a little strange, but the thought has been bugging me for a while now. Please indulge me for a moment. Let’s revisit the days of analog photography. You know, when we all used to shoot on film. When you shot a photo, the emulsion of the film was burned by the light. Using a little chemistry, the burned areas were processed and made stable, thus producing a negative. The negative was then used to produce as many prints as you wanted and in whatever size you wanted.

Now in the era of digital photography, we don’t have negatives. We don’t have anything physical from which to produce prints. Images can viewed on a monitor or mobile device, but the viewing is transient and without some type of device, cannot be seen at all. The digital image you just captured, doesn’t exist in the way that a negative does. It only exists in the form of electromagnetic energy. You can’t see them, you can’t touch them, they are merely data.

The argument can be made that a digital image doesn’t really exist until it is actually printed and brought into the physical world. I guess you can use an analogy that a book doesn’t really exist if all the words are just in the author’s head. It’s not until they are printed that they become a book. (I know this leads to the whole debate about electronic books, but I’m not going down that road). I think you get my point.

I’m afraid we are all going to be lose a lot of cherished photos because we mistakenly believe that digital images are permanent. Hard drives will fail. With the best intentions, backups will be planned, but never executed. DVDs and CDs will degrade and become unusable. Data will be lost. File formats will change.

I was fortunate. My father was an amateur photographer and took tons of photos. My mom was good about creating photo albums and thereby preserved family moments. These are images I truly cherish.

mom_small

 

 

 

I cannot imagine not having this snapshot.  This is a photo of my mother at age 19, taken by my father in Germany during June of 1946. In the photo my mom is on a merry-go-round at a  carnival. I’m sure my dad was doing something goofy behind the camera to make her laugh.

They had met while he was in the Army and stationed there after World War II. She was German and met him when she ducked into a doorway to get out of the rain. The doorway happened to be the entrance to a police station where my dad was stationed as an MP.

If this photo had been stored on a hard drive rather than in an album, would it still be around 68 years later?

Is there any data on your computer that you plan on preserving for 68 years?

 

 

 

My suggestion is that you:

1) Backup all your photos to more than one external drive (this means camera phone images too). Camera phones sometimes contain some really valuable images. Especially after time passes and people leave our lives.

2) Print the photos you want to preserve. Print using archival inks or let a pro lab print them for you. Most images printed on regular paper with cheap inks will degrade pretty quickly. Spend the money and get them printed so that they will last.

3) If you take lots of photos, organize them on your computer. Make sure all your photos are stored so that they can be easily found and backed up. Often it makes sense to have one main folder, then use subfolders to further organize them.

30 years from now, your grandkids/family members would much rather have an old dusty photo album to look at than an unreadable DVD. It’s conceivable that a generation that is now growing up carrying a camera with them at all times may be a generation that leaves fewer photos for their children/grandchildren.

I think regular family portraits are priceless and are usually appreciated more as time goes by. But don’t forget the candid photos and snapshots. Sometimes capturing those unposed, unplanned moments are worth their weight in gold.

Just some food for thought. Thanks for reading!

-Ken.

A digital camera with no LCD? Brilliant?

Ok, maybe this is a little crazy sounding but bear with me for a few minutes. Leica recently released a limited production digital camera with no LCD. That’s right. There no way to view the photos you just took until you upload them to your computer. Here’s a link.

I know, it sounds like madness, but there could be a good idea buried in that little trip to looney-ville. First of all, the only controls the camera has is focus, shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. So, basically it’s all up to you to craft the photo. So, I guess question is, “is that a bad thing”? There are no menus to navigate, no settings to tweak (or curse, or blame), so what you get out of it is what you put into it.

Just maybe, knowing it’s all up to you will unlock a little creativity and originality that’s sitting there dormant.

Here’s a good analogy from musician Brian Eno on the topic of using digital music technologies:

“Why is it that people can still make interesting stuff, not only interesting but innovative stuff, using those tools which in digital terms are hopelessly limited?

…The reason is, because it’s hopelessly limited. …You very quickly can understand what you can do with an electric guitar or a violin or a set of drums and you stop looking for more options, and you start grappling with it. You say, ‘okay this is what it does, so what do I do?

The problem with software-based work is that you can never exhaust what it does, so you can always cover the fact that you haven’t got an idea by trying another option in the tools.

So if you have a lot of options, you don’t usually have a lot of rapport with the instrument. If you have fewer options, your rapport keeps increasing”.

Is this also true about a camera? If you stop worrying about the hundreds of setting on the back of your digital camera and stop worrying about how you are going to work with the image in post processing, will you build a closer relationship with the camera and lens? Will it make you a better photographer? Will you start concentrating on the important stuff?

Just something to think about.

Thanks for reading.

-Ken.

Photo Editing Software

There are tons of photo editing software choices. Which one you select is a very personal decision and should be based on what you photograph, how you work (workflow), your personal preference, and finally your budget.

Yesterday, I had lunch with some photographer friends. During our conversation the topic of software briefly arose. Everyone there, but me, shoots weddings so we all had very different opinions of what works best. It’s a topic that is debated regularly in photographic circles and when you get past all of the techno-speak, it really boils down to what works best for you.

Look for software that allows you to download a free trial version. Most trials downloads are only good for a limited amount of time, so once you install it, make sure you can devote some time to giving a fair shake.

Some programs allow you to do some really cool things to images and have a large toolkit. But that’s not the only consideration. Also look to see how well the software meshes with the kind of work you do and the way you like to work. Going thru a software evaluation process can also help you re-define your workflow and bring out ways you can work more efficiently. Don’t be afraid to try new things.

This highly manipulated composite image was created using Adobe Photoshop CS6. However, it could have been made using other software packages.

This highly manipulated composite image was created using Adobe Photoshop CS6. However, it could have been made using other software packages. Find the one that works best for you.

Like always, thanks for reading!

-Ken

The Commercial World: The customer is always right.

For some reason, this morning I was reflecting on a interesting commercial shoot I did a couple of years ago. I’m going to change some details of the story (for obvious reasons), but the facts are true.

I was hired by an ad agency to shoot some photos at a company that restores and refurbishes chrome car parts. They can take an old rusty bumper that looks destined to be recycled and make it a thing of beauty. My job was to shoot photos of the restoration process and then shoot some before and after photos of a bumper. Simple enough, right?

Shooting the restoration process went well and the Art Director (AD) and the client were both happy. So it was time to shoot the before and after photos. I found the ideal location for the shoot. The weather was nice that day with lightly overcast skies. So the AD and I had a workman bring the bumpers outside to a shady place beside the building. I had set up a roll of gray paper and a couple of lights and using that in conjunction with the natural lighting, created a beautiful lighting setup. The reflections in the chrome were under control, the graceful curves of the bumper were sculpted by the light and shadow, all was well.

I shot a few frames and felt pretty good about the results so the AD suggested that I show them to client. I went to the client’s office and told him I had some sample shots. He looked at the display on the back of my camera and immediately shook his head. He said he wanted the bumper to look “shinier”. I pointed out how the reflections and highlights in the chrome helped show the smoothness of the lines and contours of the bumper. He nodded and said he still wanted it to look “shinier”. I wasn’t sure what that meant, but I knew the AD had worked with this client in past and felt confident that he knew what I was missing.

I went back to the set and told the AD what happened. He asked me “what does he mean, shinier?”. My only idea is that he wanted harder, more specular highlights. So I added more lights and removed all the modifiers. Shooting with only standard 7 inch reflectors, I took several more frames and returned to the client’s office. He said he liked it better, but it still needed to be “shinier”. He then took out his phone and showed me a photo he’d taken in his warehouse of a bumper. He said “like this”. I finally knew what he wanted. He wanted a professional quality, camera-phone-like, photo of a bumper.

Returning to the set, I told the AD what transpired. I had an idea to make the client happy. We abandoned the set and moved into the warehouse. We placed the bumper on the floor with the chrome surface facing up. I used a couple of lights to partially illuminate the ceiling, then set up an 8 ft ladder next to bumper. That’s how I photographed the bumper. It was mostly lit by the warehouse ceiling lights which caused lots of small specular highlights against the dark ceiling. The strobes I added helped reduce the darkness of the ceiling and but retained the contrast. The only problem was that there was a small reflection of me standing on an orange ladder, but that could be fixed in post processing.

We showed the photos to the client and he loved them. His bumpers looked “shinier”.

There are lessons to be learned here. The first is, the client likes what the client likes. We can try to educate our customers the best we can, but it really comes down to making them happy. You have to put your ego aside and listen to your customer. The next lesson is about communication. It’s good to have clear expectations as to what the client wants before the shooting starts. And finally, you have to think outside the box and come up with creative and unconventional solutions to problems. Not everything you try will work, but you have to be willing to go outside your comfort level and try something strange and different.

While the final images would not have been the ones I would have chosen, it’s the client’s product that he’s trying to sell. He’s responsible for his advertising choices. It’s my job to provide him with the images he wants to accomplish his goals.

Well, that’s it for this time. Thanks for reading and be sure to check out some of my commercial images here.

-Ken.

The Photography Business and Sunday Mornings.

OK, I have to admit, I like the hustle and bustle of the work week. I love my job, even those days when I have to wake up at the crack of dawn and drive 3 hours to a commercial shoot in the middle of no where. I really love what I do. But I also have to admit, I really like Sunday mornings.

Sunday mornings around our house are quiet. Often, I’ll get up before my wife and grab my MacBook, a cup of coffee, and my Leica and retreat to the sunroom ( a small 12×15 room with 2 walls of windows facing south and west). For a couple of hours I’ll browse the web, look for creative inspiration, review personal photos I’ve taken throughout the week, and generally just do very little. Most of the time our two large goofy hounds will join me, lounge at my feet and wait patiently for my wife to wake and join us.

It’s a couple of hours of down time specifically allocated to be used for down time. It’s nice. It’s time used to provide clarity to life that can be chaotic and sometimes seem out of control. It’s time used to make plans and set goals. Today those objects could be long term, life goals. Or maybe they could be just plans for breakfast. Sunday mornings have no rules. That’s one reason I love them.

Photo of the Sunroom

The Sunroom

Thanks for reading. Oh, and if you want to see some of my personal photography projects, check this out. Personal projects are works I do just for myself (because I strangely feel inclined to create them) or as pro-bono work for organizations/charities.

-Ken.

An example of a simple portrait lighting setup.

Sometimes photographic lighting configurations can be very complex and intimidating. However, they don’t always have to be. Sometimes, simple works.

The portrait below is actually a 2 light setup, shot in my studio on gray paper. The key light used a jumbo soft box to the right of the subject, just out of frame. A large silver reflector was placed to the left, again, just out of frame. The background is lit with a standard 7 inch reflector shooting thru a 20 degree grid and a green gel. A foam-core gobo was used to create the lines on the background.

Portrait using green gel

That’s it. Pretty simple. It goes to show that you don’t always need a lot of lights to create a striking photo.

That’s it for now. Thanks for reading!

-Ken.

“New Photographers” an Ongoing Debate.

There has been a debate going on for the last several years about the role that “new” photographers are playing in the evolution of the photography business. I think I understand both sides of the argument and I don’t think the answer is simple or clear cut.

First of all, it’s difficult to frame the debate because the argument tends to expand, but let me start with the basic proposition. Some established professional photographers are finding it difficult to stay in business because there are so many new photographers selling their service for prices well below the market rate. (I define these “new” photographers as people with little or no training or experience and who claim professional status). These new photographers usually are doing this work as a side job, and can work for less money because it is not their sole source of income.

If new photographers are ever expecting to earn a subsistence wage from working as a photographer they have to understand that competing solely on a price basis will never allow that to happen. There will always be someone willing to work for less money and there will always be clients that under-value what a good photographer can provide. The new photographer’s goal should be to develop their skill level to the point that people are willing to pay market rate for their services. Otherwise, they will be known as a “discount” photographer and it will be difficult to change the public’s perception if they ever want raise their prices to market levels.

Now, I know the question immediately begs itself: How does a new photographer develop their skills to the point that they are salable at market rates, without entering the marketplace? That’s a tough question that doesn’t have an easy answer. It helps to have some sort of training (college or trade school) or experience (job training, yearbook photographer, school newspaper, etc.). In lieu of that, you just need to learn the craft on your own thru pro-bono work, internships, or assisting an experienced photographer.

The definition of a “professional” photographer varies from person to person and from day to day. But most everyone will agree that it includes the skill to produce consistent, repeatable, high quality results that meet or exceed your customer’s expectations under a variety of conditions.

Often, the established “old-school” photographers will lament the “good old days” when everyone shot film and had brick and mortar studios. Several years ago there were barriers to entering the market place. You had to 1) have enough capital to start a photography business, and 2) have the ability and talent to deliver high quality photos to your client. Both of those barriers are now mostly gone. Many new photographers now work out of their homes, which in itself is not a problem if their business model makes allowances for that. Sadly, a lack of ability/talent doesn’t dissuade many of them from attempting to do business as a professional. The result is that either the customer is disappointed in the final results, or the customer had low expectations to begin with (due to the low price) and they are happy with the less than stellar results.

Social media often compounds the problem and helps blur the lines of what defines quality photography. This changes the consumer’s expectations and demand. Through social media, people are served more photographs in 15 minutes than they would normally see in a year. The standards that define a good quality photograph, gets lost in all the noise. What defines a great photograph in the world of social media is the number of “likes” it gets, not the true aesthetics of the image. Components like technical quality, composition, balance, etc. are marginalized (if not lost altogether). The public is conditioned to think if a photo of a cute kitten has a 100 “likes” it must be a great photo. It’s not. It’s a picture of a kitten.

The established photographer must now use his/her talent and business experience to differentiate themselves from their new competition. They cannot rely on stasis to keep them afloat in a changing environment.

The world of business is dynamic. And make no mistake, professional photography is a business. Regardless if you are an established photographer or a new one just entering the profession, you have to identify your competition, evaluate your customer’s demands, provide a service that differentiates you from your competition, and adjust your business strategy accordingly (and often) if you want to survive. In a nutshell, you can’t be selling VHS tapes when your competition is selling streaming HD video.

The real winner in the situation should ultimately be the consumer. Competition should help elevate the quality of work, providing the consumer can identify, appreciate, and be willing to pay for a good product. A problem results when the consumer is willing to settle for mediocrity in the quality of work in exchange for discounted prices. In this scenario, no one really wins.

Fortunately, there will always be great photographers who have the talent and skill to produce extraordinary work and also have the business savvy to be able to market it. There will also be consumers who can identify a great photograph and appreciate what it represents.

Anyway, that’s the way I see it.

Thanks for reading!

-Ken.

Photography is an art and a skill.

The other day I was talking to a fellow photographer and a friend. He has a full time job that pays the bills but photography is his passion. As it turns out, the daily activities of life (working, caring for a family, etc.) have left very little time lately for him to use his camera.

While we were talking, Bob (not you, the other Bob) told me that he is finding that he is forgetting some of the basic rules and tricks that every photographer knows. This was causing him a lack of confidence, which caused him apprehension about shooting, which caused him to shoot less, which caused him to start forgetting basics. It was a self fulfilling downward spiral and was affecting not only his confidence, but also his inspiration.

So what was my advise? Take more pictures. Take. More. Pictures. Photography is an art and it is a skill. I think the artist in each of us is something that never leaves. It’s something we are born with. However, the skill we cultivate to bring forth the art, well, that can be a different story. Someone can be born with a propensity for music and start playing a piano at a very young age. But it takes time to learn the techniques and motor skills that makes them a world class pianist. Only through years of practice does the natural gift for music and skills to bring it forth, collide.

And so it is with other forms of artistic expression. The more you study it, the more you do it, the better you get. And when you stop? The artist inside doesn’t go away, it’s just that the skills may get a little rusty.

Here’s an unexpected to benefit to taking more photos: You will find inspiration. But you say “Of what? I don’t feel inspired to work on any projects”. That’s the point. By forcing yourself to use your skills, you will discover things that will inspire you. I’ve heard many painters say that the best inspiration is to sit at a canvas and just start painting. The act of practicing your skills will lead to reigniting your passion and inspiration.

Inspiration seldom comes out of nowhere like a lighting bolt. It seldom comes from sitting on a couch. It seldom hits you while you are stuck in traffic. More often than not, it comes through an evolutionary process that starts with you actually doing something. One thing leads to another, which leads to another, and all of sudden you feel compelled to shoot something, beautiful, scary, shocking, touching, or whatever your passion steers you toward.

Take. More. Pictures.

That’s it for this week.

If you got here via a search engine, but sure to check out the rest of my website here.

Thanks for reading.

-Ken.

Converting color photos to black and white.

I know I’ve written about this before. Not all color to B&W conversions are the same. Some people create a B&W image by simply desaturating a color photo. While that certainly works, it usually leaves the image flat looking with a very poor dynamic range and tonality. There is an art to creating a good B&W conversion. One reason why is that you cannot convert all your color images to B&W the same way because different colors render differently when seen as shades of gray.

If you want to see why colors look different in B&W, I have a simple exercise for you. Below is a color image with one yellow panel and one blue panel. I’ve seen these colors on alternating fabric panels on a golf umbrella, so there’s a real world reason I picked them. Download this image to your computer.

colorb&w

Now, open this image in your photo editing software. Try different techniques to make it a B&W image. Try doing a simple desaturation, convert it to grayscale, a B&W mask, etc. If you notice, different methods of conversion will give you different results. Usually, just desaturating this image will make both panels look the same.

If this was a real photograph, you may be left with decisions to make. For instance, you may be able to get the yellow and blue panels to look good in B&W, but what about other elements in the photo? Did skin tones change? Did grass or leaves start looking unnatural? A good B&W photo may involve some compromises in order to get the best dynamic range and overall tonality. I suggest you try different techniques for different photos to see what you feel is best. Sometime a conversion method that works great on a portrait won’t work on a landscape.

Thanks for reading!

-Ken.

New Website Domain

I decided to add a new website domain to my website. You can now get to my website not only by using www.kenrieves.com, but also by using www.commercialart.photos.

Now there is two ways to get to this site! The new domain is a little more descriptive of what I do and I hope it will make it easier to for people to find their way here.

Thanks for reading!!

– Ken.

Loading...
X